Sunday, December 2, 2012

EU ETS stands for Emissions Trading System. Basically what this system does is controls how much emissions can be released by participants. These participants are able to sell and trade their allowance as they please just like playing cards. Each participant is given a stack of playing cards and can trade with other participants and try to get the best set to win. However you can only do what your cards allow you to do, if you go beyond that then there are consequences such as having to pay x amount of money for every bit you go over.

One of the articles handed out in class says that the money received from countries for going over their allowance is not required to be spent on environmental purposes. Plus the money that America would be losing in this would actually be put to better use here with jobs in the airlines. Honestly why not create some environmental jobs here in the states as well with that money. The U.S. has gone out of their way to try and make the world that we live in safer from carbon dioxide. By improving fuel efficiency, taking cars off the road that were dangerous to the environment and building new cars that are more affordable and better on mother nature. They didn't just improve cars, airplanes now have fuel saving engines. The U.S. is at least trying and to have someone come in and tell you it's not good enough is not they way this world should be run.

There are other countries that are not in favor such as China, and India. This money can be better spent in the countries then in the European Union. We all have neighbors some we like some we don't, but you can't force one of your neighbors to give you money because you don't like that they use a gas snow blower rather than an electric one. It's not your driveway, and not your property. If you were the one that was in charge of removing all snow in the neighborhood then by all means use your electric snow blower, but last I checked the European Union doesn't own all the airlines and all the routes in the world.

Of course EU thinks that they are trying to save the world. Look at it this way EU, if you want to reduce the amount of emissions that the aviation world gives off than reduce yours more than the other countries let off and maybe they'll follow in your footsteps, but don't force them to and then charge them money if they don't.  You think that you're really going to be hurting us by not allowing our airlines to fly into your country? Both countries will hurt from it. If EU doesn't let planes in from China then China is going to do the same thing right back, and so will other countries. In the end all EU will be doing is hurting themselves.

As for the last question, I bet you already know where I stand. If I want to wear a graduation gown made out of recycled plastic bottles than I would, but if I don't want to, then don't force me to. If I want to own a plane that let's off a lot of toxic fumes and is a hard core gas guzzler than I have the right to do so because I live in the United States of America...not Europe.

3 comments:

  1. I completely agree with what you are saying about having the right to do what you want. However, you know that by having this " gas guzzler airplane" as you call it is going to affect the environment for everybody else. Don’t you think that is a little selfish? With views like this you wont have worry about a graduation gown anytime soon.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I just learned that our graduation gowns are made out of recycled plastic bottles. Amazing. Are you familiar with EarthHour.org?Should we apply that sort of event to the world of aviation?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting point, however, gas guzzlers benefit no one - including the airlines themselves. So do I hear you say that you think more efficient technology is the approach ;-)?

    ReplyDelete